Shenandoah Telecommunications Company Reports Operating Results and Growth in Customers for the First Quarter 2011
First Quarter 2011 Highlights
Highlights for the quarter include:
-
Revenue of
$60.4 million , an increase of 45% from first quarter 2010 -
Net income from continuing operations of
$3.1 million , compared to$6.6 million in first quarter 2010 -
Adjusted operating income before depreciation and amortization (adjusted OIBDA) of
$21.3 million , an increase of$1.4 million from the first quarter of 2010 - Net PCS additions of 3,016 postpaid customers and 13,287 prepaid customers
- Cable segment revenue generating units increased 2,438 during the first quarter of 2011, compared to an increase of 2,158 in the first quarter of 2010
- Postpaid churn was 1.76% compared to 1.85% in fourth quarter 2010 and 1.91% in first quarter 2010. Prepaid churn was 4.50% compared to 4.63% in fourth quarter 2010
-
In
April 2011 , negotiated a 50 basis point reduction in the base rate margin over LIBOR applicable to the largest component of our long-term debt
President and CEO,
Consolidated First Quarter Results
For the quarter ended
Wireless Segment
Wireless segment operating income decreased
The Company continued to experience customer growth in its postpaid wireless markets, adding 3,016 net retail postpaid customers during the first quarter of 2011, compared to the 1,706 net added during the first quarter of 2010. Gross adds of retail postpaid customers for first quarter 2011 totaled 15,486, up from 14,928 in the first quarter of 2010. The Company's postpaid
During the first quarter, the Company added 13,287 net prepaid subscribers, ending the quarter with 80,243 prepaid subscribers. Gross additions of prepaid subscribers totaled 23,170 in first quarter 2011, up from 19,199 added in the fourth quarter of 2010. Prepaid churn was 4.50% for the quarter.
Cable TV Segment
Cable segment operating income declined
Revenue generating units (the sum of voice, data, video and digital video subscribers) totaled 130,700 at the end of the first quarter of 2011, an increase of 2,438 compared to an increase of 2,158 in the first quarter of 2010.
Wireline Segment
Wireline segment operating income increased
Other Information
Capital expenditures were
Cash and cash equivalents as of
The Company continues to work with potential buyers interested in purchasing its Converged Services operations.
Conference Call and Webcast
The Company will host a conference call and simultaneous webcast on
Teleconference Information:
Friday, May 6, 2011 , 10:00 A. M. (ET)
Dial in number: 1-888-695-7639
Audio webcast: www.shentel.com
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY |
||
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited) |
||
(In thousands) |
||
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
March 31, |
December 31, |
|
2011 |
2010 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 26,558 |
$ 27,453 |
Other current assets |
38,505 |
43,347 |
Investments |
8,740 |
9,090 |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
504,092 |
492,173 |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
218,161 |
212,122 |
Net property, plant and equipment |
285,931 |
280,051 |
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
87,355 |
90,389 |
Other assets, net |
16,076 |
16,107 |
Total assets |
$463,165 |
$466,437 |
|
|
|
Current liabilities, exclusive of current maturities of long-term debt of $17,180 and $14,823, respectively |
$ 27,425 |
$ 30,075 |
Long-term debt, including current maturities |
192,081 |
195,112 |
Total other liabilities |
50,013 |
50,945 |
Total shareholders' equity |
193,646 |
190,305 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
$463,165 |
$466,437 |
|
|
|
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY |
|||||
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited) |
|||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||
|
|
|
|||
|
Three months ended |
||||
|
March 31, |
||||
|
2011 |
2010 |
|||
Revenues |
$60,428 |
$41,597 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Cost of goods and services |
26,061 |
13,972 |
|||
Selling, general and administrative |
13,338 |
7,780 |
|||
Depreciation & amortization |
13,938 |
8,327 |
|||
Operating expenses |
53,337 |
30,079 |
|||
Operating income |
7,091 |
11,518 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
(1,819) |
(310) |
|||
Other income (expense), net |
93 |
21 |
|||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
5,365 |
11,229 |
|||
Income tax expense |
2,305 |
4,648 |
|||
Net income from continuing operations |
$3,060 |
$6,581 |
|||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
(33) |
173 |
|||
Net income |
$3,027 |
$ 6,754 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
$0.13 |
$0.28 |
|||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
-- |
0.01 |
|||
Net income |
$0.13 |
$0.29 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measure
In managing our business and assessing our financial performance, management supplements the information provided by financial statement measures prepared in accordance with GAAP with adjusted OIBDA, which is considered a "non-GAAP financial measure" under
Adjusted OIBDA is defined by us as operating income (loss) before depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude the effects of: certain non-recurring transactions; impairment of assets; share based compensation expense; business acquisition costs; and pension settlement and curtailment expenses. Adjusted OIBDA should not be construed as an alternative to operating income as determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of operating performance.
In a capital-intensive industry such as telecommunications, management believes that adjusted OIBDA and the associated percentage margin calculations are meaningful measures of our operating performance. We use adjusted OIBDA as a supplemental performance measure because management believes it facilitates comparisons of our operating performance from period to period and comparisons of our operating performance to that of other companies by excluding potential differences caused by the age and book depreciation of fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expenses) as well as the other items described above for which additional adjustments were made. In the future, management expects that the Company may again report adjusted OIBDA excluding these items and may incur expenses similar to these excluded items. Accordingly, the exclusion of these and other similar items from our non-GAAP presentation should not be interpreted as implying these items are non-recurring, infrequent or unusual.
While depreciation and amortization are considered operating costs under generally accepted accounting principles, these expenses primarily represent the current period allocation of costs associated with long-lived assets acquired or constructed in prior periods, and accordingly may obscure underlying operating trends for some purposes. By isolating the effects of these expenses and other items that vary from period to period without any correlation to our underlying performance, or that vary widely among similar companies, management believes adjusted OIBDA facilitates internal comparisons of our historical operating performance, which are used by management for business planning purposes, and also facilitates comparisons of our performance relative to that of our competitors. In addition, we believe that adjusted OIBDA and similar measures are widely used by investors and financial analysts as measures of our financial performance over time, and to compare our financial performance with that of other companies in our industry.
Adjusted OIBDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. These limitations include the following:
- it does not reflect capital expenditures;
- the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future and adjusted OIBDA does not reflect cash requirements for such replacements;
- it does not reflect costs associated with share-based awards exchanged for employee services;
- it does not reflect interest expense necessary to service interest or principal payments on indebtedness;
- it does not reflect expenses incurred for the payment of income taxes and other taxes; and
- other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate adjusted OIBDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
In light of these limitations, management considers adjusted OIBDA as a financial performance measure that supplements but does not replace the information reflected in our GAAP results.
The following table shows adjusted OIBDA for the three months ended
(in thousands) |
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2011 | 2010 | |
Adjusted OIBDA | $21,339 | $19,987 |
The following table reconciles adjusted OIBDA to operating income, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to adjusted OIBDA:
(in thousands) |
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2011 | 2010 | |
Operating income | $ 7,091 | $11,518 |
Plus depreciation and amortization | 13,938 | 8,327 |
OIBDA | 21,029 | 19,845 |
Plus share based compensation expense | 310 | 142 |
Adjusted OIBDA | $21,339 | $19,987 |
About
This release contains forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of unforeseen factors. A discussion of factors that may cause actual results to differ from management's projections, forecasts, estimates and expectations is available in the Company filings with the SEC. Those factors may include changes in general economic conditions, increases in costs, changes in regulation and other competitive factors.
CONTACT:Source:Adele M. Skolits at 540-984-5161
News Provided by Acquire Media